Castlevania: Rondo of Blood

Dracula is causting problems once again and a vampire killer from the Belmont clan storms his way through Castlevania to stop him in a classic 2d action platformer that never got a US release. The game is pretty rare, and I’m lucky enough to own a copy, so I wanted to talk with you guys about it.

This game is often claimed to be the best Castlevania game. I think it definitely could be.

Though it didn't get released in the West, the game is perfectly playable for people who don’t speak Japanese, with the exception of a couple cutscenes. All menus and indicators are in English. There’s no region locking on TurboGrafx-CD games, so people outside of Japan shouldn’t have difficulty getting this to run. If you want to play the game with English cutscenes, you’ll have to play Castlevania: The Dracula X Chronicles for PSP and unlock Rondo of Blood within that game.

This article will be an analysis of what makes this game so great. I’ll try to be as light on the spoilers as I can, because you really should go into this game blind and be surprised by what it has to offer. Castlevania: Rondo of Blood gets so many things right that few games do.

Design Balance

Games very often have dominant strategies that take precedence over most or all of the others. For example, as great as Contra is, it’s really disappointing how powerful Spread Shot is compared to everything else. The game would be a lot better and more fun if every powerup was useful. It really sucks having your fate decided for you because one way to play is clearly more optimal to the others. You’re stuck doing what works.

As most of you already know, Castlevania games have a powerup called a Subweapon, which is projectile attack you pick up that can be activated at the expense of Hearts. Many Castlevania games are designed in such a way that some Subweapons are nearly useless and some are incredibly powerful. This sucks because it locks you into one playstyle and it robs the game of strategy and variety.

Rondo of Blood doesn’t have this problem. Every Subweapon in this game is powerful in different ways, and they also have to be used in conjunction with Richter’s basic moves and the whip. Instead of picking a favorite and using it for the entire game, the game constantly demands that you swap Subweapons to fit your needs in the area you’re about to enter next. And while the whip is powerful, there are plenty of hazards in the game that require you to use a Subweapon instead. And these Subweapon choices aren’t cryptic, you can simply play an area without the Axe and you will think to yourself “the Axe would be really handy right about now” and remember that for next time.

This kind of game balance can’t be achieved by simply adjusting all the weapon strengths in a game’s code. The entire game has to be designed around this concept from start to finish, and it has to be a high-priority goal in the game’s design process. If you were to look at all the enemies and levels in Rondo of Blood, you’d see a good spread where each Subweapon has areas it excels in and areas where it’s sub-optimal or even useless. This is fantastic game design, where the whole game and its individual parts are designed to complement each other.

I’ve seen a lot of games fail to do what Rondo of Blood does. Games with massive AAA budgets or games with very talented developers often fall victim to their games being ruined by this phenomenon of one single strategy taking over the entire game. And what results is boring, because you just do the same exact thing for the entire game.

I believe if a game gives a player strategic options, every strategy should have a use somewhere, and no one strategy should too useful. Rondo of Blood proves how this philosophy results in a great game.

Strong Basic Toolset

Richter Belmont, the main character of Rondo of Blood, is designed to have controls that strongly resemble the early classic Castlevania games, with a lot of very subtle improvements. Rondo of Blood doesn’t aim to reinvent classic Castlevania gameplay, it’s an attempt to perfect it.

The former stiffness of early Castlevania installments has been refined into tight controls that still offer challenge but give the player enough mobility to attack and defend comfortably. Richter has a couple new maneuvers, but it seems like these were added with very special care not to deviate too much from the classic feel.

When you double tap the jump button, Richter will execute a backflip. At first you might wonder when you’re ever going to use it, but there are so many opportunities for backflips in this game. Richter will fall right into a safe pocket of many enemy attack animations and often end up in an advantageous position on landing. It’s satisfying, useful, and it’s one of the game’s best features.

There’s a couple other quality-of-life improvements as well. If you pick up a Subweapon, your previously held Subweapon will appear on the ground so you can get it again if you picked up the new one by mistake.

You can also hold down the attack button to lock Richter facing in one direction regardless of which direction you walk, which makes aiming the whip and Subweapons much easier in certain situations.

A Healthy Dose of Randomness

Rondo of Blood strikes a nice balance between predictability and unpredictability. I don’t want to go into excruciating detail about this, but this game has a lot of controlled chaos in it that keeps the game from being a step by step procedure. Enemies can spawn in different areas and amounts, and bosses generally select from their set of attack patterns randomly. I really like how this game takes the middle ground between totally scripted events and complete randomness, and it’s a pretty smart approach to game design. You can learn this game in a general sense, but there’s still going to be things you encounter in every run that you have to react to in the moment.

Branching Paths

I don’t want to make the claim that every game necessarily needs branching paths. It’s true that a lot of games with branching paths are enhanced and enjoy extra replayability because of it, but it’s not a requirement for a game to be good or to even have good replayability. A game needs a good reason for branching paths in order to make the game better with it. Game development costs time and money, and development studios might not necessarily get a return on their investment by adding all these extra optional levels. I’ve definitely played games like this where I had no desire to play them again to see what I missed.

Castlevania: Rondo of Blood branches heavily, and with the wide variety of levels, enemies and bosses, individual playthroughs will be wildly different depending on the route taken. Castlevania III had this feature, but Rondo of Blood has a better idea of different routes being discovered within the levels via secrets rather than selecting a path via a menu screen. A couple of these secret paths can be cryptic, but for the most part, you’ll find them if you put in the effort to look for them.

It is so much more satisfying discovering a hidden path on your own than having it handed to you the way it does in Castlevania 3. I love the 3rd Castlevania, but this is a element that’s done far better in Rondo of Blood.

The big justification for Rondo of Blood’s branching path system, besides giving the player fun rewards for exploration if they choose to play the game again, is the fact that this game is very difficult. The branching path system definitely alleviates the player getting stumped by a particular level or boss, because they can try a different path where they may fare better. That is where the branching path idea starts to really become a good idea.

I think the branching paths compliment this game because it’s the kind of game with very fairly designed challenge that rewards practice. It’s likely you’ll be interested in playing this game multiple times to get better at it, and the branching paths can make that experience more interesting. The hardest stage in the game is on one of these secret alternate paths, so there is something to strive for even after you’ve completed the game.

There are some pretty big secrets to find in this game, and one literally game-changing secret which I won’t spoil, so you definitely should be experimenting and poking around the levels to see what you find.

Impressive Presentation

Castlevania: Rondo of Blood has aged very well, and I think it will continue to. The only quirk is the sound effects, which are standard TurboGrafx-16 sound effects which play over the CD audio of the music track. I think there’s a certain charm to this clashing of sound quality, as it’s something that is very specific to its time and no other.

Just about every character sprite in this game has been reused in future Castlevania titles, with added frames to make the animation smoother. If another remake of Rondo of Blood was to be attempted, all of these upgraded sprites could be brought back into the game they were taken from and make for a truly spectacular experience. If those of you out there who make fan games are looking for your next project, consider that one. I would love to play Rondo of Blood with Richter’s smoother controls and animations from Symphony of the Night (without the additional silly and overpowered abilities he got in that game, of course).

A Fair Challenge

This game is very tough, but it’s the kind of tough where you can learn for yourself how to get through. You don’t need a walkthrough for this game, and it’s more fun to go in completely blind. I like games that are self-contained in that way, and there are way too many games out there that necessitate some kind of guide to get through without suffering excessive amounts of frustration. If you know Richter’s moves and keep trying the levels, you can get through this game.

Conclusion

I find it strange this game didn’t get a US release. I think it would have been a big seller on the Playstation 1 because of the commercial success of Castlevania: Symphony of the Night and the general popularity of the Castlevania franchise in the US. American audiences were definitely ready for this game, and it never came.

There was a SNES adaptation which ended up being a very different game, and a PSP remake which came years later. Each of those versions require their own review, so I’ll be talking about them later.

Unless you truly dislike difficult games or 2d action platformers, I think this is definitely a game you need to play someday. Every Castlevania fan should play it, for sure.